Some real-life tales are certainly stranger than fiction—and that features this story out of India surrounding a pair who’ve sued their son for not offering them with grandchildren. The couple’s lawsuit cites that as a result of all the cash they’ve spent on their son all through the course of his life, he ought to have given them grandchildren by now.
@CNN reviews, Indian couple Sadhana and Sanjeev Prasad, who reside in Haridwar, a northern metropolis in Uttarakhand, have filed a formal lawsuit towards their son, 35 and his spouse, 31 as a result of the 2 have but to provide a grandchild regardless of being married for the final six years. The couple is suing for 50 million rupees, which components out to round $643,000 in USD. The Prasads declare that over the course of his life, they spent 20 million rupees (round $257,000) elevating their son, who can also be the couple’s solely youngster.
Arvind Srivastava, who’s Sadhana and Sanjeev’s authorized consultant, says
“They raised him, educated him, made him succesful, made him a pilot — which was costly. They see individuals of their neighborhood enjoying with their grandchildren and really feel like they need to even have one. They mentioned they didn’t marry (their son and daughter-in-law) off in order that they’ll reside alone. So, they mentioned that within the subsequent 12 months, both give us a grandchild or give us compensation.”
Though this lawsuit could appear unbelievable, the problem of familial obligation in India has been on the middle of controversy for years. In Indian tradition, carrying the household lineage and caring for aged dad and mom and in-laws is usually considered a filial obligation.
Srivastava additionally added that with out grandchildren, the couple says “there’s no-one to care for them [as they age]” and “all dad and mom want to be grandparents in the future.”
Need tea instantly in your textual content inbox? Hit us up at 917-722-8057 or click on right here to affix!