Breaking News

Amber Heard NOT ‘A Sufferer Of Home Violence’, Testifies Longtime LAPD Officer Who Intently Examined Her Face The Night time Of 911 Name

Johnny Depp is suing Amber Heard over what she wrote in her 2018 Washington Put up op-ed, describing for the primary time many months and several other incidents of home violence. However it began with that first accusation.

As followers of the ever messier divorce and subsequent authorized battle know, Amber claimed practically six years in the past now, again in Might 2016 — days after submitting for divorce, that her then-husband had thrown an iPhone at her face. She offered proof within the type of a now-famous {photograph} exhibiting an abrasion on her cheek and eyebrow.

Amber Heard hit with phone
(c) Amber Heard

For years now, Johnny and his authorized crew have disputed the declare, saying Johnny by no means damage Amber, and particularly not on this occasion. They usually’ve tried every little thing they may to show it.

Final yr they put out Los Angeles Police Division bodycam footage from that evening, exhibiting there was no harm to the couple’s condo — immediately contradicting Amber and her mates’ claims that they’d wrecked the place with their violent battle.

There was phrase again then that in depositions, the officers who had been known as in on a home disturbance report that evening had been additionally corroborating Johnny’s model of occasions. And now we lastly have that proof.

Associated: Psychologist Decided Amber Has Borderline Character Dysfunction

In beforehand filmed testimony that was performed in courtroom on Tuesday, Officer Melissa Saenz gave her transient report on what she noticed that evening. She said underneath oath about Amber’s claims:

“I didn’t establish her as a sufferer of home violence.”

On Might 21, 2016, at about 9 p.m., Officer Saenz and her associate (a trainee named Officer Tyler Hadden) entered the condo in response to a home dispute name. In her most surprising little bit of testimony, frankly, Saenz informed the courtroom she didn’t on the time know who the celebs had been. We imply, clearly working in El Lay you meet so many stars you get jaded — and in that exact line of labor you actually can’t get starstruck. However she didn’t know who Johnny Depp was?? She did say she was “impressed” by the wealth on show within the downtown penthouse. However nonetheless, wow.

Anyway, after a couple of minutes within the dwelling, the 12-year LAPD vet and her associate left with out taking any notes or submitting a report, simply deciding the decision was “closed.” Why? As a result of they’d decided no crime had taken place. Whereas Amber was “red-eyed” and gave the impression to be “crying” she confirmed no indicators of harm.

Whereas it was a while in the past, this isn’t out of the blue for Officer Saenz. She was additionally requested in regards to the go to simply weeks after the incident, in July 2016, as a part of the couple’s divorce proceedings. In that deposition, she apparently additionally stated that in an interview, Amber had “informed her she was not damage” and didn’t want to make a criticism. Clearly it’s not unusual for a home violence sufferer to again off and even defend their abuser when police arrive. Nonetheless, Saenz stated she did her due diligence and “carefully examined her face and located no marks, swelling, or harm to her face.”

Associated: Eire Baldwin Calls Amber A ‘Horrible Particular person’ After Abuse Audio

An necessary notice — the explanation we didn’t hear from Officer Saenz in the course of the UK libel trial (which Johnny misplaced) is seemingly as a result of lack of notes and pictures to again up the cops’ testimony. We aren’t attorneys, however that doesn’t make numerous sense to us — the sworn testimony of an officer of the legislation is at all times utilized in courtroom circumstances. And if all of Amber’s testimony was disregarded as a consequence of lack of latest notes and different proof, wouldn’t this complete factor have already got gone to Johnny? We aren’t attempting to be humorous right here. That is all coming right down to testimony — so why go away this out??

You may see the testimony for your self beginning at in regards to the 5:50:00 mark (under):

What do YOU consider the newest within the case??

[Image via Law&Crime Network/YouTube.]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *