In line with the Related Press, Minnesota prosecutors won’t cost law enforcement officials who fatally shot Amir Locke whereas serving a no-knock warrant in February.
Locke, 22, who can be Black, was sleeping on his cousin’s sofa when the Minnesota SWAT workforce entered the condominium with out knocking in relation to a murder investigation.
In line with prosecutors, footage from the physique digicam reveals Locke pointing a gun at Officer Mark Hanneman, “justifying his use of lethal pressure,” the Related Press additionally studies.
Locke’s household disagreed with these findings. They said he was woke up out of his sleep and grabbed the gun that he owned and was additionally licensed to hold.
Karen Wells, Locke’s mom, mentioned she was not going to surrender combating for her son.
“This isn’t over. You might have been discovered not responsible, however within the eyes of me, being the mom who I’m, you’re responsible,” Wells mentioned. “And I’m not going to surrender. Proceed to have your stressed nights, as a result of I do know you do.”
Legal professional Common Keith Ellison and Hennepin County Legal professional Michael Freeman said “there was inadequate proof to show past an affordable doubt that Hanneman violated the state statute governing when police can use lethal pressure.”
“It will be unethical for us to file costs in a case by which we all know that we won’t be able to prevail as a result of the legislation doesn’t assist the costs,” Ellison mentioned.
After the tragic incident, Benjamin Crump commented on the loss of life of Locke and said, “Locke, who has a number of relations in legislation enforcement and no previous legal historical past, legally possessed a firearm on the time of his loss of life.” He continued, “Just like the case of Breonna Taylor, the tragic killing of Amir Locke reveals a sample of no-knock warrants having lethal penalties for Black People.”
As you already know, Taylor was shot and killed by police throughout a botched raid in Louisville, KY in March 2020.
